China ‘996 Work Culture’ Dates Back 2,200 Years, Shows Work-life Balance Struggles Through Centuries


In modern China, the so-called 996 work culture, working six days a week from 9am to 9pm, has become a major point of contention.

While some advocate for the gruelling schedule as a fast track to success, others decry it as “modern slavery”, pointing to cases where excessive work hours have led to severe health problems or even death.

The debate was first ignited in 2019, when an anonymous protest on GitHub, a global developer platform owned by Microsoft, drew attention to how the 996 culture threatens the well-being of technology workers.

Image shows that in ancient times, merchants awoke before dawn and worked late into the night, often deprived of a good night’s sleep, and exerted themselves far more than their modern counterparts.

The schedule breaches China’s labour law, which limits work to eight hours a day and 44 hours a week.

However, the phenomenon of overwork is far from new.

Long before tech giants emerged, Chinese workers had endured similar pressures for centuries.

During the Warring States period (475-221 BC), official Dong He worked tirelessly day and night while negotiating with a rival kingdom, one of the earliest records of overtime.

In the Qin dynasty (221-206 BC), officials had to leave home by 4 or 5am due to poor transport and often worked until 7pm.

Farmers laboured from sunrise to sunset, while merchants slept fewer than four hours to run their businesses.

The illustration depicts farmers labouring on their farmland before sunrise and continuing well into the evening.

Attending the morning meeting was essential in ancient times, which strictly enforced punctuality and early hours.

In the Tang dynasty (618-907), officials received 20 lashes in punishment for a single day of absence; 35 days of absence resulted in a year-long sentence. Latecomers were also punished by being struck.

A Ming dynasty (1368-1644) official, terrified of the consequences for tardiness, rushed through the palace in a panic, only to slip and drown in a river.

Alongside the pressures of regular work and attendance, ancient civil servants also had to manage shift duties, which often came at the expense of their personal time and family life.

In addition to regular work and attendance pressures, ancient civil servants also faced the burden of shift duties, sacrificing personal time and family life.

The Tang dynasty introduced a night-duty system, requiring some officials to work three to four shifts within 10 days to handle both routine documents and urgent matters.

Ancient officials did not receive overtime pay, but their diligence could earn them the emperor’s favour.

During the Eastern Han period (25-220), an official named Huang Xiang frequently covered for his colleagues.

When the emperor found him working off duty, he was impressed by his dedication and promoted him.

Even emperors were no strangers to hard work.

Ming dynasty founder Zhu Yuanzhang reviewed 1,660 memorials in just eight days and required his ministers to process over 200 documents daily.

Qing dynasty (1644-1912), Emperor Yongzheng, a renowned workaholic, slept only four hours a night and wrote over 10 million words in

The Han dynasty introduced a “rest and bath day,” allowing officials one day off every five days, while the Tang and Song dynasties, known for their economic prosperity, provided relatively more rest for labourers

He granted himself only three holidays a year: the Spring Festival, Winter Solstice and his birthday.

Emperor Yongzheng was also passionate about reading and working at night, avoiding entertainment like imperial hunts or summer retreats.

Reports suggest he owned 35 pairs of glasses, kept throughout the palace for easy access.

Despite the heavy workload, rest was still valued in ancient society.

The Han dynasty (206 BC-220) introduced a “rest and bath day,” giving officials one day off every five days.

The Tang and Song dynasties, marked by economic prosperity, offered relatively more respite for labourers.

Tang officials rested one day every 10 days, with additional breaks for festivals and visiting elderly parents, with marriage leave lasting up to nine months.

A hardworking office in today’s China. The debate over so-called “996” work schedules continues to rage.

In the Song dynasty (960-1279), officials could enjoy up to 98 rest days annually.

From renowned figures to ordinary citizens, complaints about endless labour are woven throughout Chinese history.

Around 1,800 years ago, ancient workers carved grievances such as “I am too tired” and “no overtime pay” into stone bricks, which are now displayed in a museum in Anhui province, central China, and still resonate with visitors today.

The Tang poet Bai Juyi spent most of his time working long hours.

He captured his early departures and late returns in poetry, expressing his disdain for official duties and asking: “When will I be able to leave office and regain my freedom?”

Even after his hair turned white, Ming dynasty painter Wen Zhengming still had to do night duties.

In his poetry, he described himself as “weary in spirit, like someone ill” while working.

The struggle to balance work and life has been a persistent theme through the ages.

Confucian classics lauded hard work as a moral virtue, warning that laziness would lead to failure.

Today, the reverence for diligence persists, with make-up work days compensating for long national holidays, highlighting the ongoing tension between work and rest in China’s modern labour landscape.

 

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

Wondershare Filmora 15 Banner PDFelement v12 banner PDFelement Safe Internet Day Banner 2026

 

 

 

 

Wary for Claim Photo Shows James Peterson, Man Lobotomized For Being Gay in 1948


In early 2026, an image circulated online that supposedly showed a man named James Peterson after doctors lobotomized him for being gay.

The claim: An image authentically shows a real person named James Peterson, who doctors lobotomized in 1948 for being gay.

The claim spread on Facebook, Instagram and YouTube. Many fans ask whether Peterson’s story was real. Here’s how one popular Facebook post described Peterson’s life:

In 1948, James Peterson was lobotomized for being gay. His parents committed him after discovering his love for another man. The asylum labeled it “sexual perversion” and “treated” him with a transorbital lobotomy—ice picks hammered above his eye sockets into his frontal lobe. It took just 15 minutes, but it erased his vibrant, artistic spirit forever. The doctor assured his parents: “Your son’s perversion is corrected.”What returned was an empty shell—no desires, no passions, not even for life.

However, many of these posts of the image included a watermark in the bottom right corner indicating that someone created the picture using Grok, the generative artificial intelligence tool on X. As such, we have rated this image as fake.

Take a closer look at the James Peterson image revealed that it was generated using Grok, X’s artificial intelligence tool. (Facebook user Yesterday’s Wisdom/Wikimedia Commons)

There’s no evidence that Peterson, specifically, ever existed. However, doctors did use lobotomies to “treat” homosexuality in the 20th century as a form of “conversion therapy,” a widely discredited practice that attempted to change a person’s sexuality or gender identity.

The earliest version of the image appeared to be posted on Dec. 27, 2025, by a Facebook account called Yesterday’s Wisdom, which frequently publishes fake historical images and videos generated by artificial intelligence. It was not possible to reach out to the account’s manager because the page listed no contact information.

Many of the posts circulating online claimed that Peterson’s supposed partner donated the photograph and medical documents to an LGBTQ+ archive, which makes it especially suspicious that no credible records of Peterson show up online.

A reverse image search for the picture of Peterson determined that the image did not appear to be inspired by or an enhanced version of any legitimate photo of a real person with lobotomy scars.

Posts claimed that Peterson underwent a “transorbital lobotomy.” However, real transorbital lobotomies did not involve creating incisions because cuts happened through the eye sockets. That means no visible scarring occurred — as shown in credible images of patients after transorbital lobotomies — unlike the circular scars in the image of Peterson.

A physician named Walter J. Freeman II developed the now-obsolete transorbital lobotomy in the mid-20th century to treat all kinds of mental illnesses — whether real or perceived. At the time, psychiatrists believed homosexuality was a mental disorder; the American Psychiatric Association stopped considering it as such in 1973.

One Smithsonian Channel documentary reported that roughly 40% of Freeman’s patients were gay men.

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

Wondershare Filmora 15 Banner PDFelement v12 banner PDFelement Safe Internet Day Banner 2026

Images Showing Abandoned KFC Bucket-shaped Restaurant

In February 2026, a post to Facebook shared several images of an abandoned KFC restaurant designed in the shape and appearance of one of its signature chicken buckets. The images’ caption merely read, “An abandoned bucket-shaped fast food restaurant. Would you visit it?”

The claim: Images shared online in February 2026 authentically showed a bucket-shaped KFC restaurant in Dayton, Ohio, that was closed and abandoned years ago.

The same Facebook page also posted a video allegedly exploring the restaurant with clips shot from the same places the images were taken. According to the description of the video, the “abandoned bucket-shaped restaurant outside Dayton, Ohio, closed in 2021” and was “never cleaned out.”

Other Facebook pages and X accounts that shared the images also claimed the restaurant was in Dayton and closed in 2021.

In short, the images and video of the bucket KFC were generated with artificial intelligence tools and the story about the restaurant was fictional. Therefore, we have rated the claim as fake.

Google leaves invisible watermarks in images and videos generated with its AI tools. These watermarks can be detected by Google’s SynthID AI tool. When we checked one of the images in the post with the tool, the check found that “most or all of this image was edited or generated with Google AI.”

The original post’s edit history revealed the post once had a disclaimer about the images’ AI origins. They were posted on Feb. 13, 2026, with the description, “An abandoned bucket-shaped fast food restaurant hidden outside Dayton, Ohio. Closed in 2021 after financial collapse, the entire building was left untouched — from the dining area to the basement storage rooms. A forgotten piece of fast-food history frozen in time.”

Later that day the page edited the post to remove the em dash and add a disclaimer that said, “This is an AI-generated fictional abandoned location and a fictional story.” We archived this version of the post. The same disclaimer also appeared at the end of the video’s description. However, the page removed the detailed description and the AI disclaimer from the images in favor of the “would you visit it?” description about an hour later.

Apparently, the page, appeared to post mostly AI-generated content consisting of fictional abandoned places. Many of these images had the same AI disclaimers that were removed from the KFC bucket restaurant post, including those attached to a post depicting another abandoned KFC and to a video of a Kmart that the page similarly claimed was closed in 2021 for financial reasons and left untouched since.

The images of the bucket KFC themselves included several major clues confirming they were AI-generated. For example, two images included a poster to the left of the counter that was filled with gibberish, which has long been a common type of mistake made by AI when generating content.

In the image of the hidden storage basement, the lights were on, suggesting the building still had power even though the location was supposed to have been abandoned for five years. Many of the boxes in the image lacked dust or cobwebs even though cobwebs remained on the ceiling and the boxes had five years to build up dust.

Finally, the windows as they appeared from inside the restaurant didn’t match the size and shape of the same windows as seen from outside, though they should have been identical.

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

Wondershare Filmora 15 Banner PDFelement v12 banner PDFelement Safe Internet Day Banner 2026