Images Showing Abandoned KFC Bucket-shaped Restaurant

In February 2026, a post to Facebook shared several images of an abandoned KFC restaurant designed in the shape and appearance of one of its signature chicken buckets. The images’ caption merely read, “An abandoned bucket-shaped fast food restaurant. Would you visit it?”

The claim: Images shared online in February 2026 authentically showed a bucket-shaped KFC restaurant in Dayton, Ohio, that was closed and abandoned years ago.

The same Facebook page also posted a video allegedly exploring the restaurant with clips shot from the same places the images were taken. According to the description of the video, the “abandoned bucket-shaped restaurant outside Dayton, Ohio, closed in 2021” and was “never cleaned out.”

Other Facebook pages and X accounts that shared the images also claimed the restaurant was in Dayton and closed in 2021.

In short, the images and video of the bucket KFC were generated with artificial intelligence tools and the story about the restaurant was fictional. Therefore, we have rated the claim as fake.

Google leaves invisible watermarks in images and videos generated with its AI tools. These watermarks can be detected by Google’s SynthID AI tool. When we checked one of the images in the post with the tool, the check found that “most or all of this image was edited or generated with Google AI.”

The original post’s edit history revealed the post once had a disclaimer about the images’ AI origins. They were posted on Feb. 13, 2026, with the description, “An abandoned bucket-shaped fast food restaurant hidden outside Dayton, Ohio. Closed in 2021 after financial collapse, the entire building was left untouched — from the dining area to the basement storage rooms. A forgotten piece of fast-food history frozen in time.”

Later that day the page edited the post to remove the em dash and add a disclaimer that said, “This is an AI-generated fictional abandoned location and a fictional story.” We archived this version of the post. The same disclaimer also appeared at the end of the video’s description. However, the page removed the detailed description and the AI disclaimer from the images in favor of the “would you visit it?” description about an hour later.

Apparently, the page, appeared to post mostly AI-generated content consisting of fictional abandoned places. Many of these images had the same AI disclaimers that were removed from the KFC bucket restaurant post, including those attached to a post depicting another abandoned KFC and to a video of a Kmart that the page similarly claimed was closed in 2021 for financial reasons and left untouched since.

The images of the bucket KFC themselves included several major clues confirming they were AI-generated. For example, two images included a poster to the left of the counter that was filled with gibberish, which has long been a common type of mistake made by AI when generating content.

In the image of the hidden storage basement, the lights were on, suggesting the building still had power even though the location was supposed to have been abandoned for five years. Many of the boxes in the image lacked dust or cobwebs even though cobwebs remained on the ceiling and the boxes had five years to build up dust.

Finally, the windows as they appeared from inside the restaurant didn’t match the size and shape of the same windows as seen from outside, though they should have been identical.

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

PDFelement v12 banner

Wondershare RecoveritData Recovery

Beware Of Vintage Photo Supposedly Showing Rothschild Family Posing With ‘Demon’


In early February 2026, a vintage black-and-white image resurfaced online allegedly showing the Rothschild family, a European banking dynasty stretching back several centuries, standing in front of a house alongside a creature that looked like a demon.

The claim: A vintage black-and-white photo shared online for years shows members of the Rothschild family standing next to a demon.

For example, one X user who posted the picture wrote: “Wait, what? So this was actually a real Rothschild Family Photo. Wild.”


(X user @BGatesIsaPyscho)

Examples of the claim appeared on X and Facebook as early as 2024. One X user wanted to know if the picture had been manipulated, while others replied to the post asking whether the image was real.

However, details in the image revealed it was generated using artificial intelligence (AI) software. The facial features of the two children — such as the ears, eyes, noses and mouths — were visibly distorted, along with the collars of the two men. Such inconsistencies are a common feature of AI-generated images.

AI-detection sites Umm-Maybe AI and Hive Moderation both concluded the picture was highly likely to be AI-generated. (It should be noted that such tools are fallible and therefore are not sufficient, on their own, to determine the authenticity of a photo.)

Given the above, we rated this photo fake.


(Hugging Face / Umm-Maybe AI-image-detector)


(Hive Moderation AI-Generated Content Detection)

According to a reverse image search, a Tumblr account posted the earliest iteration of the picture in late May 2023, alongside other clearly AI-generated images. It was not possible to confirm whether the Tumblr account posted the original version of the photo.

Additionally, other social media users had previously used the same image to satirize numerous families and groups whom they jokingly claimed it depicted, such as the British royal family, the family of Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and British Conservative politician Jacob Rees-Mogg’s family.

The Rothschilds are best known as a European banking dynasty stretching back several centuries. They are frequently the target of misinformation and antisemitic conspiracy theories, such as linking the family to the Illuminati, the New World Order, and other shadowy groups that supposedly influence world governments. They have also been blamed for starting wars for personal gain, funding the Holocaust, and assassinating U.S. presidents.

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

PDFelement v12 banner

Wondershare RecoveritData Recovery

The Claim that Earth Is Getting Temporary ‘Second Moon’ Stretches the Truth


Rumors that Earth had picked up a new companion in the form of a so-called “second moon” began spreading online in late December 2025 and continued to light up social media into the new year.

Amateur astronomers took to social media platforms such as X to share their excitement over the purported discovery, with some users claiming that NASA “has confirmed that Earth will temporarily have a ‘second moon.'”

(@forallcurious via X)

It is true that astronomers discovered “a relatively short-lived quasi-satellite of Earth” and dubbed it 2025 PN7, according to a paper published by the American Astronomical Society in September 2025, which also mentioned the existence of six other known quasi-satellites, also called “quasi-moons,” currently orbiting alongside Earth.

The Pan-STARRS observatory in Hawaii first clocked 2025 PN7 on Aug. 2, 2025. Major news outlets, including CNN, ABC News, Yahoo, Smithsonian Magazine, The New York Times and Northeastern University’s Northeastern Global News, also reported the discovery.

It would be misleading to call 2025 PN7 a “second moon,” however, and there is no evidence that NASA “confirmed” as much, despite social media posts’ claims. 2025 PN7 was searchable through NASA’s Small-Body Database Lookup, which displayed scientific data of the object.

According to NASA, that 2025 PN7 is an asteroid and a “quasi-moon,” and explained how these objects differ from true moons. “Unlike a moon a quasi-moon is not gravitationally bound to Earth but follows an orbit around the Sun that makes it linger near Earth for an extended period of time,” the NASA spokesperson said.

In other words, quasi-moons orbit the Sun, while moons orbit a planet — like Earth’s moon. Therefore, claims that 2025 PN7 is a “second moon” are misleading.

The paper published by AAS added, “Quasi-satellites are in a resonant orbit but are not gravitationally bound to Earth, allowing for more sustained, though unbound, proximity; while mini-moons are characterized by temporary gravitational captures by Earth, meaning they are gravitationally bound, albeit for a limited time.”

The length of time for which the asteroid has been in step with Earth’s orbit did not appear in the NASA database nor the AAS paper, but NASA said, “2025 PN7 has been in this configuration since at least the past 70 years and will remain so for another 60 years.”

NASA’s timeline matched the information in a New York Times report, which included an interview with Carlos de la Fuente Marcos, a researcher at Complutense University of Madrid and co-author of the AAS paper. The Times wrote that 2025 PN7 “seems to have shifted into its quasi-moon orbit in 1957 — just in time to witness the launch of Sputnik 1, Earth’s first artificial satellite.” The report also suggested that 2025 PN7 would be in step with Earth’s orbit for another 60 years before moving elsewhere.

“These asteroids are relatively easy to access for unmanned missions and can be used to test planetary exploration technologies with a relatively modest investment,” CNN quoted de la Fuente Marcos as saying, emphasizing the importance of such a discovery.

But readers can rest easy knowing astronomers also confirmed that 2025 PN7 — and quasi-satellites in general — pose no threat to Earth. According to de la Fuente Marcos, the closest distance to Earth 2025 PN7 reached during its orbit was 186,000 miles.

For comparison, the Moon is “an average of 238,855 miles” from Earth, according to NASA.

The claim “As of late 2025, NASA had confirmed the existence of a temporary second moon that would remain in orbit next to Earth until 2083”.

In sum, it is true that astronomers discovered a quasi-satellite, or “quasi-moon,” that will keep pace with Earth’s orbit for the next 60 years or so, but calling it a “second moon” is misleading at best.

 

 

"As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases"

PDFelement v12 banner

Wondershare RecoveritData Recovery